Description

This lecture has two keynote speakers: Michael Purugganan (Evolution of Domesticated Plant Species) and Ingo Potrykus (The potential of GMO's for public good & the tough lessons from the Humanitarian Golden Rice project). Michael Purugganan: Evolution of Domesticated Plant Species Domestication of species, whether they are crop species for agriculture or model species for the laboratory, are among the most interesting co-evolutionary phenomenon in nature. The ability to sequence genomes with greater facility, coupled with new mathematical approaches to analyzing genomic variation data, are opening new vistas in our understanding of species evolution. Using examples from various species, we will discuss patterns of variation in genome sequence and structure, including potential functional consequences of observed changes as well as possible inferences into the nature of evolution. Overall, we will explore what insights these new genomics data may offer into the process of plant evolution. Ingo Potrykus: The potential of GMO's for public good & the tough lessons from the Humanitarian Golden Rice project ‘Golden Rice’ was developed in the public domain, with public funding and with the goal, to contribute to a reduction in vitamin A-malnutrition in rice-dependent poor societies. Proof-of-concept for the engineered biosynthetic pathway was completed by February 1999. Product development beyond basic research did not find any support from the public domain. The project was rescued only because of support from the private sector. Problems related to intellectual property rights involved with the basic technology were solved within half a year. Product optimisation by the private sector was donated to the humanitarian project. The putative impact of Golden Rice was calculated to up to 40 000 lives saved per year for India alone. Development of locally adapted varieties for target countries such as The Philippines, India, Vietnam, Bangladesh, Indonesia, China is by public national and international rice research institutes, with financial support from national governments and altruistic organisations. Despite of substantial support Golden Rice will not reach the farmer before 2012. If Golden Rice were not ‘genetically engineered’ (GE), variety development and registration would have been completed by 2002. The difference in time between traditional variety development and that of a GMO-based variety of ten years is due to nothing else but routine, regulatory requirements. This difference translates, on the basis of the calculated impact, to far more than 400’000 lives lost. This is especially difficult to accept for a case, where no risk to the environment or to the consumer can be claimed even hypothetically. The lessons from this case are: 1)GMO regulation delays use of GE-based products for ca. ten years and carries a huge financial penalty. 2)Time and costs for delivery of a GE-product to the market are, as the consequence of regulation, so immense that no public institution nor any small or medium sized private enterprise can afford the necessary investment in personnel or funds. 3)The consequence is a de-facto monopoly for GE-products for a few financially potent companies. 4)Numerous public GE-projects, including many from developing country laboratories and for orphan crops, will never make it to the market place. 5)The damage to lives and welfare is enormous and affects the poor, and not the rich Western societies, which are responsible for the GE-hysteria. 6)There is no scientific justification for the world-wide established GE-regulatory system based on the concept of an ‘extreme precautionary approach’. 7)However, there is a moral imperative to make GE-technology available for public good. To attend this KEYNOTE and have it counted towards your credits, PLEASE REGISTER for WEP288A.